|
|
@@ -400,15 +400,17 @@ Beyond that, what I'm mainly interested in is feedback on the content.
|
|
|
enough background to understand the other chapters? Does each chapter make
|
|
|
it clear what work and analyses I have done? Do the figures clearly communicate
|
|
|
the results I'm trying to show? Do you feel that the claims in the results
|
|
|
- and discussion sections are well-supported? Additionally, while I am well
|
|
|
- aware that Chapter 1 (the introduction) contains many un-cited claims,
|
|
|
- all the other chapters (2,3, and 4)
|
|
|
+ and discussion sections are well-supported? There's no need to suggest
|
|
|
+ improvements; just note areas that you feel need improvement.
|
|
|
+ Additionally, while I am well aware that Chapter 1 (the introduction) contains
|
|
|
+ many un-cited claims, all the other chapters (2,3, and 4)
|
|
|
\emph on
|
|
|
should
|
|
|
\emph default
|
|
|
be fully cited.
|
|
|
So if you notice any un-cited claims in those chapters, please flag them
|
|
|
for my attention.
|
|
|
+ Similarly, if you discover any factual errors, please note them as well.
|
|
|
\end_layout
|
|
|
|
|
|
\begin_layout Standard
|
