|
@@ -2052,8 +2052,16 @@ frozen
|
|
|
\end_inset
|
|
|
|
|
|
, so that each array is effectively normalized against this frozen reference
|
|
|
- set rather than the other arrays in the data set under study [CITE].
|
|
|
- Other array normalization methods considered include dChip,
|
|
|
+ set rather than the other arrays in the data set under study
|
|
|
+\begin_inset CommandInset citation
|
|
|
+LatexCommand cite
|
|
|
+key "McCall2010"
|
|
|
+literal "false"
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+\end_inset
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+.
|
|
|
+ Other available array normalization methods considered include dChip,
|
|
|
\begin_inset Flex Glossary Term
|
|
|
status open
|
|
|
|
|
@@ -2649,22 +2657,16 @@ memory CD4 T-cells
|
|
|
\end_layout
|
|
|
|
|
|
\begin_layout Standard
|
|
|
-\begin_inset Flex TODO Note (inline)
|
|
|
-status open
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-\begin_layout Plain Layout
|
|
|
-Is it ok to just copy a bunch of citations from the intros to Sarah's papers?
|
|
|
- That feels like cheating somehow.
|
|
|
-\end_layout
|
|
|
+CD4 T-cells are central to all adaptive immune responses, as well as immune
|
|
|
+ memory
|
|
|
+\begin_inset CommandInset citation
|
|
|
+LatexCommand cite
|
|
|
+key "Murphy2012"
|
|
|
+literal "false"
|
|
|
|
|
|
\end_inset
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-\end_layout
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-\begin_layout Standard
|
|
|
-CD4 T-cells are central to all adaptive immune responses, as well as immune
|
|
|
- memory [CITE?].
|
|
|
+.
|
|
|
After an infection is cleared, a subset of the naïve CD4 T-cells that responded
|
|
|
to that infection differentiate into memory CD4 T-cells, which are responsible
|
|
|
for responding to the same pathogen in the future.
|
|
@@ -3210,8 +3212,16 @@ literal "false"
|
|
|
\end_inset
|
|
|
|
|
|
.
|
|
|
- Each quantification was tested with both Ensembl transcripts and UCSC known
|
|
|
- gene annotations [CITE? Also which versions of each?].
|
|
|
+ Each quantification was tested with both Ensembl transcripts and GENCODE
|
|
|
+ known gene annotations
|
|
|
+\begin_inset CommandInset citation
|
|
|
+LatexCommand cite
|
|
|
+key "Zerbino2018,Harrow2012"
|
|
|
+literal "false"
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+\end_inset
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+.
|
|
|
Comparisons of downstream results from each combination of quantification
|
|
|
method and reference revealed that all quantifications gave broadly similar
|
|
|
results for most genes, so shoal with the Ensembl annotation was chosen
|
|
@@ -5982,10 +5992,10 @@ noprefix "false"
|
|
|
\end_inset
|
|
|
|
|
|
gives a summary of the peak calling statistics for each histone mark.
|
|
|
- Consistent with previous observations [CITATION NEEDED], all 3 histone
|
|
|
- marks occur in broad regions spanning many consecutive nucleosomes, rather
|
|
|
- than in sharp peaks as would be expected for a transcription factor or
|
|
|
- other molecule that binds to specific sites.
|
|
|
+ Consistent with previous observations, all 3 histone marks occur in broad
|
|
|
+ regions spanning many consecutive nucleosomes, rather than in sharp peaks
|
|
|
+ as would be expected for a transcription factor or other molecule that
|
|
|
+ binds to specific sites.
|
|
|
This conclusion is further supported by Figure
|
|
|
\begin_inset CommandInset ref
|
|
|
LatexCommand ref
|
|
@@ -6122,9 +6132,8 @@ This plot shows the distribution of distances from each annotated transcription
|
|
|
start site in the genome to the nearest called peak.
|
|
|
Each line represents one combination of histone mark, cell type, and time
|
|
|
point.
|
|
|
- Distributions are smoothed using kernel density estimation [CITE? see ggplot2
|
|
|
- stat_density()].
|
|
|
- Transcription start sites that occur
|
|
|
+ Distributions are smoothed using kernel density estimation.
|
|
|
+ TSSs that occur
|
|
|
\emph on
|
|
|
within
|
|
|
\emph default
|
|
@@ -6446,7 +6455,15 @@ Expression distributions of genes with and without promoter peaks.
|
|
|
\begin_layout Standard
|
|
|
H3K4me2 and H3K4me2 have previously been reported as activating marks whose
|
|
|
presence in a gene's promoter is associated with higher gene expression,
|
|
|
- while H3K27me3 has been reported as inactivating [CITE].
|
|
|
+ while H3K27me3 has been reported as inactivating
|
|
|
+\begin_inset CommandInset citation
|
|
|
+LatexCommand cite
|
|
|
+key "LaMere2016,LaMere2017"
|
|
|
+literal "false"
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+\end_inset
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+.
|
|
|
The data are consistent with this characterization: genes whose promoters
|
|
|
(as defined by the radii for each histone mark listed in
|
|
|
\begin_inset CommandInset ref
|
|
@@ -10494,19 +10511,6 @@ Approach
|
|
|
Proper pre-processing is essential for array data
|
|
|
\end_layout
|
|
|
|
|
|
-\begin_layout Standard
|
|
|
-\begin_inset Flex TODO Note (inline)
|
|
|
-status open
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-\begin_layout Plain Layout
|
|
|
-This section could probably use some citations
|
|
|
-\end_layout
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-\end_inset
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-\end_layout
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
\begin_layout Standard
|
|
|
Microarrays, bead arrays, and similar assays produce raw data in the form
|
|
|
of fluorescence intensity measurements, with the each intensity measurement
|
|
@@ -10520,7 +10524,15 @@ Microarrays, bead arrays, and similar assays produce raw data in the form
|
|
|
out the effects of these technical factors and summarize the information
|
|
|
from multiple probes to arrive at a single usable estimate of abundance
|
|
|
or other relevant quantity, such as a ratio of two abundances, for each
|
|
|
- target.
|
|
|
+ target
|
|
|
+\begin_inset CommandInset citation
|
|
|
+LatexCommand cite
|
|
|
+key "Gentleman2005"
|
|
|
+literal "false"
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+\end_inset
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+.
|
|
|
\end_layout
|
|
|
|
|
|
\begin_layout Standard
|
|
@@ -16509,7 +16521,15 @@ T2D
|
|
|
\end_inset
|
|
|
|
|
|
and the associated metabolic syndrome represent a broad dysregulation of
|
|
|
- the body's endocrine signaling related to metabolism [citation needed].
|
|
|
+ the body's endocrine signaling related to metabolism
|
|
|
+\begin_inset CommandInset citation
|
|
|
+LatexCommand cite
|
|
|
+key "Volkmar2012,Hall2018,Yokoi2018"
|
|
|
+literal "false"
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+\end_inset
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+.
|
|
|
This dysregulation could easily manifest as a greater degree of variation
|
|
|
in the DNA methylation patterns of affected tissues.
|
|
|
In contrast,
|