|
@@ -3157,7 +3157,7 @@ noprefix "false"
|
|
|
\begin_inset Float figure
|
|
|
wide false
|
|
|
sideways false
|
|
|
-status collapsed
|
|
|
+status open
|
|
|
|
|
|
\begin_layout Plain Layout
|
|
|
\begin_inset Flex TODO Note (inline)
|
|
@@ -3509,7 +3509,7 @@ H3K4 and H3K27 promoter methylation has broadly the expected correlation
|
|
|
\begin_inset Float figure
|
|
|
wide false
|
|
|
sideways false
|
|
|
-status open
|
|
|
+status collapsed
|
|
|
|
|
|
\begin_layout Plain Layout
|
|
|
\begin_inset Flex TODO Note (inline)
|
|
@@ -3664,7 +3664,7 @@ begin{landscape}
|
|
|
\begin_inset Float table
|
|
|
wide false
|
|
|
sideways false
|
|
|
-status collapsed
|
|
|
+status open
|
|
|
|
|
|
\begin_layout Plain Layout
|
|
|
\align center
|
|
@@ -4148,7 +4148,7 @@ status open
|
|
|
\begin_inset Float figure
|
|
|
wide false
|
|
|
sideways false
|
|
|
-status collapsed
|
|
|
+status open
|
|
|
|
|
|
\begin_layout Plain Layout
|
|
|
\align center
|
|
@@ -4193,7 +4193,7 @@ PCoA plot of H3K4me2 promoters, after subtracting surrogate variables
|
|
|
\begin_inset Float figure
|
|
|
wide false
|
|
|
sideways false
|
|
|
-status collapsed
|
|
|
+status open
|
|
|
|
|
|
\begin_layout Plain Layout
|
|
|
\align center
|
|
@@ -4283,7 +4283,7 @@ PCoA plot of H3K27me3 promoters, after subtracting surrogate variables
|
|
|
\begin_inset Float figure
|
|
|
wide false
|
|
|
sideways false
|
|
|
-status collapsed
|
|
|
+status open
|
|
|
|
|
|
\begin_layout Plain Layout
|
|
|
\align center
|
|
@@ -4504,7 +4504,7 @@ begin{landscape}
|
|
|
\begin_inset Float figure
|
|
|
wide false
|
|
|
sideways false
|
|
|
-status collapsed
|
|
|
+status open
|
|
|
|
|
|
\begin_layout Plain Layout
|
|
|
\align center
|
|
@@ -4961,7 +4961,7 @@ begin{landscape}
|
|
|
\begin_inset Float figure
|
|
|
wide false
|
|
|
sideways false
|
|
|
-status collapsed
|
|
|
+status open
|
|
|
|
|
|
\begin_layout Plain Layout
|
|
|
\align center
|
|
@@ -5252,7 +5252,7 @@ begin{landscape}
|
|
|
\begin_inset Float figure
|
|
|
wide false
|
|
|
sideways false
|
|
|
-status open
|
|
|
+status collapsed
|
|
|
|
|
|
\begin_layout Plain Layout
|
|
|
\align center
|
|
@@ -5615,7 +5615,7 @@ noprefix "false"
|
|
|
However, Cluster 1, the cluster with the most elevated gene expression,
|
|
|
represents genes with elevated coverage upstream of the TSS, or equivalently,
|
|
|
decreased coverage downstream, inside the gene body.
|
|
|
- The opposite pattern, in which H3K27me3 is more abundant withing the gene
|
|
|
+ The opposite pattern, in which H3K27me3 is more abundant within the gene
|
|
|
body and less abundance in the upstream promoter region, does not show
|
|
|
any elevation in gene expression.
|
|
|
As with H3K4me2, this shows that the location of H3K27 trimethylation relative
|
|
@@ -5636,28 +5636,47 @@ Show the figures where the negative result ended this line of inquiry.
|
|
|
|
|
|
\end_layout
|
|
|
|
|
|
-\begin_layout Section
|
|
|
-Discussion
|
|
|
+\begin_layout Subsection
|
|
|
+Defined pattern analysis
|
|
|
+\end_layout
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+\begin_layout Standard
|
|
|
+\begin_inset Flex TODO Note (inline)
|
|
|
+status open
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+\begin_layout Plain Layout
|
|
|
+This was where I defined interesting expression patterns and then looked
|
|
|
+ at initial relative promoter coverage for each expression pattern.
|
|
|
+ Negative result.
|
|
|
+ I forgot about this until recently.
|
|
|
+ Worth including?
|
|
|
+\end_layout
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+\end_inset
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
\end_layout
|
|
|
|
|
|
\begin_layout Subsection
|
|
|
-Effective promoter radius
|
|
|
+Promoter CpG islands?
|
|
|
\end_layout
|
|
|
|
|
|
-\begin_layout Itemize
|
|
|
-"Promoter radius" is not constant and must be defined empirically for a
|
|
|
- given data set.
|
|
|
- Coverage within promoter radius has an expression correlation as well
|
|
|
+\begin_layout Standard
|
|
|
+\begin_inset Flex TODO Note (inline)
|
|
|
+status open
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+\begin_layout Plain Layout
|
|
|
+I forgot until recently about the work I did on this.
|
|
|
+ Worth including?
|
|
|
\end_layout
|
|
|
|
|
|
-\begin_layout Itemize
|
|
|
-Further study required to demonstarte functional consequences of effective
|
|
|
- promoter radius (e.g.
|
|
|
- show diminished association with gene expression outside radius)
|
|
|
+\end_inset
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
\end_layout
|
|
|
|
|
|
-\begin_layout Subsection
|
|
|
-Convergence
|
|
|
+\begin_layout Section
|
|
|
+Discussion
|
|
|
\end_layout
|
|
|
|
|
|
\begin_layout Standard
|
|
@@ -5665,9 +5684,7 @@ Convergence
|
|
|
status open
|
|
|
|
|
|
\begin_layout Plain Layout
|
|
|
-Look up some more references for these histone marks being involved in memory
|
|
|
- differentiation.
|
|
|
- (Ask Sarah)
|
|
|
+Write better section headers
|
|
|
\end_layout
|
|
|
|
|
|
\end_inset
|
|
@@ -5675,44 +5692,176 @@ Look up some more references for these histone marks being involved in memory
|
|
|
|
|
|
\end_layout
|
|
|
|
|
|
-\begin_layout Itemize
|
|
|
-Naive-to-memory convergence implies that naive cells are differentiating
|
|
|
- into memory cells, and that gene expression and H3K4/K27 methylation are
|
|
|
- involved in this differentiation
|
|
|
+\begin_layout Subsection
|
|
|
+Effective promoter radius
|
|
|
\end_layout
|
|
|
|
|
|
-\begin_deeper
|
|
|
-\begin_layout Itemize
|
|
|
-Convergence is consistent with Lamere2016 fig 8
|
|
|
-\begin_inset CommandInset citation
|
|
|
-LatexCommand cite
|
|
|
-key "LaMere2016"
|
|
|
-literal "false"
|
|
|
+\begin_layout Standard
|
|
|
+Figure
|
|
|
+\begin_inset CommandInset ref
|
|
|
+LatexCommand ref
|
|
|
+reference "fig:near-promoter-peak-enrich"
|
|
|
+plural "false"
|
|
|
+caps "false"
|
|
|
+noprefix "false"
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+\end_inset
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ shows that H3K4me2, H3K4me3, and H3K27me3 are all enriched near promoters,
|
|
|
+ relative to the rest of the genome, consistent with their conventionally
|
|
|
+ understood role in regulating gene transcription.
|
|
|
+ Interestingly, the radius within this enrichment occurs is not the same
|
|
|
+ for each histone mark.
|
|
|
+ H3K4me2 and H3K4me3 are enriched within a 1
|
|
|
+\begin_inset space \thinspace{}
|
|
|
+\end_inset
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+kb radius, while H3K27me3 is enriched within 2.5
|
|
|
+\begin_inset space \thinspace{}
|
|
|
+\end_inset
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+kb.
|
|
|
+ Notably, the determined promoter radius was consistent across all experimental
|
|
|
+ conditions, varying only between different histone marks.
|
|
|
+ This suggests that the conventional
|
|
|
+\begin_inset Quotes eld
|
|
|
+\end_inset
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+one size fits all
|
|
|
+\begin_inset Quotes erd
|
|
|
+\end_inset
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ approach of defining a single promoter region for each gene (or each TSS)
|
|
|
+ and using that same promoter region for analyzing all types of genomic
|
|
|
+ data within an experiment may not be appropriate, and a better approach
|
|
|
+ may be to use a separate promoter radius for each kind of data, with each
|
|
|
+ radius being derived from the data itself.
|
|
|
+ Furthermore, the apparent assymetry of upstream and downstream promoter
|
|
|
+ histone modification with respect to gene expression, seen in Figures
|
|
|
+\begin_inset CommandInset ref
|
|
|
+LatexCommand ref
|
|
|
+reference "fig:H3K4me2-neighborhood"
|
|
|
+plural "false"
|
|
|
+caps "false"
|
|
|
+noprefix "false"
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+\end_inset
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+,
|
|
|
+\begin_inset CommandInset ref
|
|
|
+LatexCommand ref
|
|
|
+reference "fig:H3K4me3-neighborhood"
|
|
|
+plural "false"
|
|
|
+caps "false"
|
|
|
+noprefix "false"
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+\end_inset
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+, and
|
|
|
+\begin_inset CommandInset ref
|
|
|
+LatexCommand ref
|
|
|
+reference "fig:H3K27me3-neighborhood"
|
|
|
+plural "false"
|
|
|
+caps "false"
|
|
|
+noprefix "false"
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+\end_inset
|
|
|
|
|
|
+, shows that even the concept of a promoter
|
|
|
+\begin_inset Quotes eld
|
|
|
\end_inset
|
|
|
|
|
|
- (which was created without the benefit of SVA)
|
|
|
+radius
|
|
|
+\begin_inset Quotes erd
|
|
|
+\end_inset
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ is likely an oversimplification.
|
|
|
+ At a minimum, nearby enrichment of peaks should be evaluated separately
|
|
|
+ for both upstream and downstream peaks, and an appropriate
|
|
|
+\begin_inset Quotes eld
|
|
|
+\end_inset
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+radius
|
|
|
+\begin_inset Quotes erd
|
|
|
+\end_inset
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ should be selected for each direction.
|
|
|
\end_layout
|
|
|
|
|
|
-\begin_layout Itemize
|
|
|
-H3K27me3, canonically regarded as a deactivating mark, seems to have a more
|
|
|
- complex effect
|
|
|
+\begin_layout Standard
|
|
|
+Figures
|
|
|
+\begin_inset CommandInset ref
|
|
|
+LatexCommand ref
|
|
|
+reference "fig:H3K4me2-neighborhood"
|
|
|
+plural "false"
|
|
|
+caps "false"
|
|
|
+noprefix "false"
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+\end_inset
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ and
|
|
|
+\begin_inset CommandInset ref
|
|
|
+LatexCommand ref
|
|
|
+reference "fig:H3K4me3-neighborhood"
|
|
|
+plural "false"
|
|
|
+caps "false"
|
|
|
+noprefix "false"
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+\end_inset
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ show that the determined promoter radius of 1
|
|
|
+\begin_inset space ~
|
|
|
+\end_inset
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+kb is approximately consistent with the distance from the TSS at which enrichmen
|
|
|
+t of H3K4 methylationis correlates with increased expression, showing that
|
|
|
+ this radius, which was determined by a simple analysis of measuring the
|
|
|
+ distance from each TSS to the nearest peak, also has functional significance.
|
|
|
+ For H3K27me3, the correlation between histone modification near the promoter
|
|
|
+ and gene expression is more complex, involving non-peak variations such
|
|
|
+ as troughs in coverage at the TSS and asymmetric coverage upstream and
|
|
|
+ downstream, so it is difficult in this case to evaluate whether the 2.5
|
|
|
+\begin_inset space ~
|
|
|
+\end_inset
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+kb radius determined from TSS-to-peak distances is functionally significant.
|
|
|
+ However, the two patterns of coverage associated with elevated expression
|
|
|
+ levels both have interesting features within this radius.
|
|
|
\end_layout
|
|
|
|
|
|
-\end_deeper
|
|
|
\begin_layout Standard
|
|
|
-\begin_inset Float figure
|
|
|
-wide false
|
|
|
-sideways false
|
|
|
+\begin_inset Flex TODO Note (inline)
|
|
|
status open
|
|
|
|
|
|
\begin_layout Plain Layout
|
|
|
+My instinct is to say
|
|
|
+\begin_inset Quotes eld
|
|
|
+\end_inset
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+further study is needed
|
|
|
+\begin_inset Quotes erd
|
|
|
+\end_inset
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ here, but that goes in Chapter 5, right?
|
|
|
+\end_layout
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+\end_inset
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+\end_layout
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+\begin_layout Subsection
|
|
|
+Convergence
|
|
|
+\end_layout
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+\begin_layout Standard
|
|
|
\begin_inset Flex TODO Note (inline)
|
|
|
status open
|
|
|
|
|
|
\begin_layout Plain Layout
|
|
|
-This float should ideally go right after the section header, but doing so
|
|
|
- crashes LaTeX.
|
|
|
+Look up some more references for these histone marks being involved in memory
|
|
|
+ differentiation.
|
|
|
+ (Ask Sarah)
|
|
|
\end_layout
|
|
|
|
|
|
\end_inset
|
|
@@ -5720,6 +5869,60 @@ This float should ideally go right after the section header, but doing so
|
|
|
|
|
|
\end_layout
|
|
|
|
|
|
+\begin_layout Standard
|
|
|
+We have observed that all 3 histone marks and the gene expression data all
|
|
|
+ exhibit evidence of convergence in abundance between naive and memory cells
|
|
|
+ by day 14 after activation (Figure
|
|
|
+\begin_inset CommandInset ref
|
|
|
+LatexCommand ref
|
|
|
+reference "fig:PCoA-promoters"
|
|
|
+plural "false"
|
|
|
+caps "false"
|
|
|
+noprefix "false"
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+\end_inset
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+, Table
|
|
|
+\begin_inset CommandInset ref
|
|
|
+LatexCommand ref
|
|
|
+reference "tab:Number-signif-promoters"
|
|
|
+plural "false"
|
|
|
+caps "false"
|
|
|
+noprefix "false"
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+\end_inset
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+).
|
|
|
+ The MOFA latent factor scatter plots (Figure
|
|
|
+\begin_inset CommandInset ref
|
|
|
+LatexCommand ref
|
|
|
+reference "fig:mofa-lf-scatter"
|
|
|
+plural "false"
|
|
|
+caps "false"
|
|
|
+noprefix "false"
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+\end_inset
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+) show that this pattern of convergence is captured in latent factor 5.
|
|
|
+ Like all the latent factors in this plot, this factor explains a substantial
|
|
|
+ portion of the variance in all 4 data sets, indicating a coordinated pattern
|
|
|
+ of variation shared across all histone marks and gene expression.
|
|
|
+ This, of course, is consistent with the expectation that any naive CD4
|
|
|
+ T-cells remaining at day 14 should have differentiated into memory cells
|
|
|
+ by that time, and should therefore have a genomic state similar to memory
|
|
|
+ cells.
|
|
|
+ This convergence is evidence that these histone marks all play an important
|
|
|
+ role in the naive-to-memory differentiation process.
|
|
|
+ A histone mark that was not involved in naive-to-memory differentiation
|
|
|
+ would not be expected to converge in this way after activation.
|
|
|
+\end_layout
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+\begin_layout Standard
|
|
|
+\begin_inset Float figure
|
|
|
+wide false
|
|
|
+sideways false
|
|
|
+status collapsed
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
\begin_layout Plain Layout
|
|
|
\align center
|
|
|
\begin_inset Graphics
|
|
@@ -5753,7 +5956,14 @@ literal "false"
|
|
|
|
|
|
\end_inset
|
|
|
|
|
|
-.
|
|
|
+,
|
|
|
+\begin_inset Quotes eld
|
|
|
+\end_inset
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Model for the role of H3K4 methylation during CD4 T-cell activation.
|
|
|
+\begin_inset Quotes erd
|
|
|
+\end_inset
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
|
|
\series default
|
|
|
Reproduced with permission.
|
|
@@ -5769,18 +5979,169 @@ Reproduced with permission.
|
|
|
|
|
|
\end_layout
|
|
|
|
|
|
+\begin_layout Standard
|
|
|
+In H3K4me2, H3K4me3, and RNA-seq, this convergence appears to be in progress
|
|
|
+ already by Day 5, shown by the smaller distance between naive and memory
|
|
|
+ cells at day 5 along the
|
|
|
+\begin_inset Formula $y$
|
|
|
+\end_inset
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+-axes in Figures
|
|
|
+\begin_inset CommandInset ref
|
|
|
+LatexCommand ref
|
|
|
+reference "fig:PCoA-H3K4me2-prom"
|
|
|
+plural "false"
|
|
|
+caps "false"
|
|
|
+noprefix "false"
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+\end_inset
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+,
|
|
|
+\begin_inset CommandInset ref
|
|
|
+LatexCommand ref
|
|
|
+reference "fig:PCoA-H3K4me3-prom"
|
|
|
+plural "false"
|
|
|
+caps "false"
|
|
|
+noprefix "false"
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+\end_inset
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+, and
|
|
|
+\begin_inset CommandInset ref
|
|
|
+LatexCommand ref
|
|
|
+reference "fig:RNA-PCA-group"
|
|
|
+plural "false"
|
|
|
+caps "false"
|
|
|
+noprefix "false"
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+\end_inset
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+.
|
|
|
+ This agrees with the model proposed by Sarah Lamere based on an prior analysis
|
|
|
+ of the same data, shown in Figure
|
|
|
+\begin_inset CommandInset ref
|
|
|
+LatexCommand ref
|
|
|
+reference "fig:Lamere2016-Fig8"
|
|
|
+plural "false"
|
|
|
+caps "false"
|
|
|
+noprefix "false"
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+\end_inset
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+, which shows the pattern of H3K4 methylation and expression for naive cells
|
|
|
+ and memory cells converging at day 5.
|
|
|
+ This model was developed without the benefit of the PCoA plots in Figure
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+\begin_inset CommandInset ref
|
|
|
+LatexCommand ref
|
|
|
+reference "fig:PCoA-promoters"
|
|
|
+plural "false"
|
|
|
+caps "false"
|
|
|
+noprefix "false"
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+\end_inset
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+, which have been corrected for confounding factors by ComBat and SVA.
|
|
|
+ This shows that proper batch correction assists in extracting meaningful
|
|
|
+ patterns in the data while eliminating systematic sources of irrelevant
|
|
|
+ variation in the data, allowing simple automated procedures like PCoA to
|
|
|
+ reveal interesting behaviors in the data that were previously only detectable
|
|
|
+ by a detailed manual analysis.
|
|
|
+\end_layout
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+\begin_layout Standard
|
|
|
+While the ideal comparison to demonstrate this convergence would be naive
|
|
|
+ cells at day 14 to memory cells at day 0, this is not feasible in this
|
|
|
+ experimental system, since neither naive nor memory cells are able to fully
|
|
|
+ return to their pre-activation state, as shown by the lack of overlap between
|
|
|
+ days 0 and 14 for either naive or memory cells in Figure
|
|
|
+\begin_inset CommandInset ref
|
|
|
+LatexCommand ref
|
|
|
+reference "fig:PCoA-promoters"
|
|
|
+plural "false"
|
|
|
+caps "false"
|
|
|
+noprefix "false"
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+\end_inset
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+.
|
|
|
+\end_layout
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
\begin_layout Subsection
|
|
|
Positional
|
|
|
\end_layout
|
|
|
|
|
|
-\begin_layout Itemize
|
|
|
-TSS positional coverage, hints of something interesting but no clear conclusions
|
|
|
+\begin_layout Standard
|
|
|
+When looking at patterns in the relative coverage of each histone mark near
|
|
|
+ the TSS of each gene, several interesting patterns were apparent.
|
|
|
+ For H3K4me2 and H3K4me3, the pattern was straightforward: the consistent
|
|
|
+ pattern across all promoters was a single peak a few kb wide, with the
|
|
|
+ main axis of variation being the position of this peak relative to the
|
|
|
+ TSS (Figures
|
|
|
+\begin_inset CommandInset ref
|
|
|
+LatexCommand ref
|
|
|
+reference "fig:H3K4me2-neighborhood"
|
|
|
+plural "false"
|
|
|
+caps "false"
|
|
|
+noprefix "false"
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+\end_inset
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ &
|
|
|
+\begin_inset CommandInset ref
|
|
|
+LatexCommand ref
|
|
|
+reference "fig:H3K4me3-neighborhood"
|
|
|
+plural "false"
|
|
|
+caps "false"
|
|
|
+noprefix "false"
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+\end_inset
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+).
|
|
|
+ There were no obvious
|
|
|
+\begin_inset Quotes eld
|
|
|
+\end_inset
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+preferred
|
|
|
+\begin_inset Quotes erd
|
|
|
+\end_inset
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ positions, but rather a continuous distribution of relative positions ranging
|
|
|
+ all across the promoter region.
|
|
|
+ The association with gene expression was also straightforward: peaks closer
|
|
|
+ to the TSS were more strongly associated with elevated gene expression.
|
|
|
+ Coverage downstream of the TSS appears to be more strongly associated with
|
|
|
+ elevated expression than coverage the same distance upstream, indicating
|
|
|
+ that the
|
|
|
+\begin_inset Quotes eld
|
|
|
+\end_inset
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+effective promoter region
|
|
|
+\begin_inset Quotes erd
|
|
|
+\end_inset
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ for H3K4me2 and H3K4me3 may be centered downstream of the TSS.
|
|
|
\end_layout
|
|
|
|
|
|
\begin_layout Standard
|
|
|
-A previous study has also found that H3K27me3 depletion within the gene
|
|
|
- body was associated with elevated gene expression in 4 different cell types
|
|
|
- in mice
|
|
|
+The relative promoter coverage for H3K27me3 had a more complex pattern,
|
|
|
+ with two specific patterns of promoter coverage associated with elevated
|
|
|
+ expression: a sharp depletion of H3K27me3 around the TSS relative to the
|
|
|
+ surrounding area, and a depletion of H3K27me3 downstream of the TSS relative
|
|
|
+ to upstream (Figure
|
|
|
+\begin_inset CommandInset ref
|
|
|
+LatexCommand ref
|
|
|
+reference "fig:H3K27me3-neighborhood"
|
|
|
+plural "false"
|
|
|
+caps "false"
|
|
|
+noprefix "false"
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+\end_inset
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+).
|
|
|
+ A previous study found that H3K27me3 depletion within the gene body was
|
|
|
+ associated with elevated gene expression in 4 different cell types in mice
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
\begin_inset CommandInset citation
|
|
|
LatexCommand cite
|
|
|
key "Young2011"
|
|
@@ -5789,6 +6150,15 @@ literal "false"
|
|
|
\end_inset
|
|
|
|
|
|
.
|
|
|
+ This is consistent with the second pattern described here.
|
|
|
+ This study also reported that a spike in coverage at the TSS was associated
|
|
|
+ with
|
|
|
+\emph on
|
|
|
+lower
|
|
|
+\emph default
|
|
|
+ expression, which is indirectly consistent with the first pattern described
|
|
|
+ here, in the sense that it associates lower H3K27me3 levels near the TSS
|
|
|
+ with higher expression.
|
|
|
\end_layout
|
|
|
|
|
|
\begin_layout Subsection
|
|
@@ -12985,6 +13355,13 @@ Current definition of promoter radius is dependent on peak calling - requires
|
|
|
N-to-M convergence deserves further study of some kind
|
|
|
\end_layout
|
|
|
|
|
|
+\begin_deeper
|
|
|
+\begin_layout Itemize
|
|
|
+maybe serial activation & rest cycles for naive and memory, showing a cyclical
|
|
|
+ pattern returning to the same state again and again after the first activation
|
|
|
+\end_layout
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+\end_deeper
|
|
|
\begin_layout Itemize
|
|
|
Promoter positional coverage: follow up on hints of interesting patterns
|
|
|
\end_layout
|