1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829 |
- This is a series of example plots and tables from a combined
- RNA-seq/ChIP-seq study on differences between naive and memory T-cell
- activation.
- - [p-value distributions.pdf](p-value distributions.pdf) is a series
- of p-value histograms for each of the contrasts tested. A contrast
- with no significant differential expression would exhibit a uniform
- distribution, while differential expression would be reflected by an
- excess of small p-values.
- - [FPKM by Peak Status H3K4.pdf](FPKM by Peak Status H3K4.pdf) shows
- the variation in gene expression based on the presence or absence of
- two histone marks in the gene promoters.
- - [promoter-edger-topgenes3-ql.xlsx](promoter-edger-topgenes3-ql.xlsx)
- is a spreadsheet of all promoters with differential histone
- modification in their promoters based on the ChIP-seq read counts.
- - [Promoter Peak Distance Profile.pdf](Promoter Peak Distance Profile.pdf)
- shows the distribution of distances from transcription
- start sites to the nearest peak for the three histone modifications
- studied. This was used to determine the "promoter radius" for read
- counting. Notably, the three histone marks do not all have the same
- promoter radius.
- - [rnaseq-edgeR-vs-limma.pdf](rnaseq-edgeR-vs-limma.pdf) and
- [rnaseq-limma-weighted-vs-uw.pdf](rnaseq-limma-weighted-vs-uw.pdf)
- show comparisons of p-values for all genes in each contrast of the
- RNA-seq data, comparing edgeR and limma-voom with/without sample
- quality weights. The final choice of method was limma-voom with
- sample quality weights.
- - [rnaseq-maplots-limma-sampleweights.pdf](rnaseq-maplots-limma-sampleweights.pdf)
- shows the MA plot for each contrast of the RNA-seq data
|